2023-11-26 08:27 pm

Part Two: Good Heavens

For personal reasons, Dr Jekyll was absolutely fixated on the idea of nerdy conventions, attending Dragon*Con being a repeated fantasy he had. Year after year he would talk about it, year after year he would never go, year after year it was just like this THING.

In 2012, I was 22 and I was stationed in southern Virginia. Dr Jekyll lives in South Carolina. Dragon*Con is in Georgia.

We went.

I thought it had this meeting could have been an email vibes overall, but it wasn't, like a bad meeting. Dull but pleasant, not something I'd do for myself again but something I'd do for someone else (and indeed I am).

But there was a problem. Two.

First, I was young. I did not yet understand that some people are not the captains of their souls. I also have some sort of deep-seated tendency to chivalry, which I now understand is a super obnoxious flaw, but at the time I did not curb it. This is the same twin problem, young and dumb, that got me landed in my first marriage.

I thought: His problem is he wants to go to Dragon*Con. I will solve it by persuading him to go to Dragon*Con.

His problem was not that he wanted to go to Dragon*Con. His problem is that Dragon*Con was a metaphor, or metonymy, for a life free from mental illness, and he is not free from mental illness.



I'm reminded of my ex and her mother, who had this Thing about hallmark holidays. If anything was less than perfect, they'd lose their minds, and they only had one way of perfection. 99% of reality is dealing with the fact it's not what you would like it to be. (Also, I can't help but remember that all the things that went wrong with the holidays at my in-laws' places were caused by the very people who wanted things to go off perfectly.)

Second: I know how the social side of cons work now, and it involves having a large (12ish) circle of friends, at least some of whom are mentally well, preparing months in advance. You can't just walk into room parties, Gordon!! I know that now because I'm organizing one such party. Also, I know that even if you, general, COULD just walk into a room party, you, specifically, WOULDN'T - remember the first night, that pickup game of Mafia? I joined and you didn't?

Where are “the memories of a lifetime” I’m supposed to have, of going with my friend Kate to Dragon*Con? The musicians, the magicians, the artists, the celebrity guests - where were they? My old high school class-mate Tom Smith, the Tom Lehrer of his generation - Kate would have got a huge kick out of his material, she’d have picked up and followed it without difficulty where her “peers” would have been baffled… I haven’t seen him in thirty years. He was there, according to the souvenir guidebook I have. It’s about all I do have… Make that, thirty years and counting.

Where are the room parties? The filking? The dancing, the (social) drinking? Where are my memories of Kate grinning delightedly and joining with the audience in the chorus?


You fool, you poltroon, you lunatic, I do not sing. I do not dance. At the time, I did not drink.

Anyway:

What the hell happened?

Well, frankly, Kate happened. That the science fiction convention I’d waited for twenty irreplaceable years to experience with a proper companion, imploded into “just another empty, solitary, pointless, missed-out botch” was Kate’s doing - yet it is not merely that I am a gentleman that I have never held her to blame.


Seven years of this, and it got increasingly bitter and more pointed. Have I mentioned this guy repeats himself, a lot? Well, SEVEN. YEARS. OF. THIS. Seven Septembers where he had a big meltdown and complained about how boring I was and how much I ruined his life (not that he blames me(!)). I was nice to him about it, too! Whenever he went off on it, I just let him go as I grew in wisdom, and soothed him as best I could.

Matters are only slightly improved by my pointing out that it all fit so perfectly that it appeears to be fated so, that in this my 50th birthday commemoration Kate played every significant female role in turn


I no longer have access to the rest of that entry, but he went into detail about how I was just like his mother (you see what happened after I hit a certain age?) and how sexually frigid and unavailable I was, just like all the other girls who wouldn't put out for him.

See, at one point, I don't remember when, we ditched the con and went swimming in the hotel pool. I had, at the time, a two-piece bathing suit, which I wore because it was the only bathing suit I had. This has caused a decade of mental illness to be thrown at me. He hugged me while we were swimming, which I did not mind (I think I might now), and I later learned that he attached an awful lot of significance to the fact it was the most female flesh he'd seen in x number of years, and each year that passed, he got more and more wound up that it had been another x number of years since he had seen female flesh.

Hyde has, as I've said, locked me out of many of his serial killer manifesto ramblings, but I can remember him going on about how my bikini "wasn't sexy - and it wasn't meant to be."

Indeed. I have never worn a swimsuit since. When I swim, which I do frequently, I wear shirts and a t-shirt. He is why.

It got worse.

In 2018/2019 this escalated to the point where he was literally telling me he wished we'd made love in Atlanta, like it was a secret and not something hideously embarrassing I had politely ignored for nearly a decade out of civility. Notes I have indicate he thought feminism did this to me and he could have cured me if he'd been younger - same refrain as the rest of the women in the first post), but he's hidden the full quote from me so I can't show you the crazy.

I am, just so we're clear, a homosexual.

I had to tell him not to send me pornography on my work phone (or, uh, at all). When I mentioned I knew someone who had been raped by someone who is a firefighter, he posted firefighter appreciation cringe and made fun of said rapist's victims. When I posted about this case, he responded:

Just what does it take to push a man fifty-four years old - we're not talking a hormone-raddled teenager, here! - who has worked at his current posting for four years apparently without incident, to attempt to roast and carve his female-half-his-age supervisor like a Thanksgiving turkey?

What he did was crazy AND stupid, no argument there. He should have simply smiled, put in his two weeks' notice and quit… and then waited a year. “Dish best served cold” and like that. To do something this self-destructively extreme must have involved extreme and prolonged provocation.

The impression I get here is not favorable to Lt. Blanchard. Had there been actual murder they might have been forced to take action, but the impression I get is a strong desire from all parties involved for that woman to not exist.


He didn't let it go, either, for years:

“The reaction to a controversy is very often more enlightening and important than the details of the allegations themselves,” Tammy Bruce said, and a clear example is Kate’s blind irrational reaction to that bizarre Leavenworth incident where a privilege-fast-tracked, Peter-principled Army supervisor was finally roasted and carved like a Thanksgiving turkey by a civilian employee twice her age whom she had repeatedly “counseled” but deemed “resistant to supervision” i e uppity. It was intensely obvious in the aftermath that she had brought this on herself; a union boss said as much, and even the investigators excluded and avoided her as much as possible!

But poor Kate sees through new eyeglasses now, and her view was of a blameless plaster saint attacked out of the blue by a fiendish plaster demon, said labels assigned by sex, not fact. (“Of course he’s wrong! He’s a male, isn’t he?” - ’70s “joke” said and meant deadly serious, the origin of “identity politics.”) What’s more, for saying what he did that union boss should be fired! (Yes: Merely expressing an opinion Kate did not like, should be grounds for termination. Zero tolerance. I wonder how she would feel if she lost her job on the same principle?)


There is, of course, no possible way a decent, sane, or thinking person of any political persuasion or attitude toward "feminism" could look at a scene where A sets B on fire and conclude B is the baddie. It can only snaps into place when you remember that Gordon was then in his mid 50s and hated every single one of his female coworkers, even and especially the ones he wanted to fuck. Rorschach, you see?

So he's a shitshow. I cut back talking to him at around the time I got divorced - a lot of excellent foundation was laid in my staff O years - and started lying to him about how I wasn't available to talk, made up an entire JRTC trip just to give myself a month's break, and, after 18 years or so, quit blogging just to avoid him. When I quit talking about my job, he made up this alternate universe in which being a brigade staff officer was a cruel tragedy and not a normal place for a pre-command captain to be.

He has mistaken my withdrawal from his horseshittery for a descent into mental illness rather than its opposite.

Kate and I remained friends, even as she swirled slowly down the drain of mental illness, as she herself recognized. My bright, fun, caring, dear friend fell into shadow and wilted, darkened, withdrew into herself and eventually disappeared. She may technically still be alive - or not! - but certes the Kate I knew exists now only in memory.


Anyway, eventually he told me that I looked bad without my college-length (ass-long) hair - and I told him to fuck off. He has since pretended that it was a compliment and he didn't mean any sexual commentary, but I've read his thoughts on female hair:

I very nearly asked Natalie to tie her hair up. She was wearing it loose as I would have it, and demonstrating why, and it was actually unpleasant - that unstyled, loosely falling, artlessly erotic avalanche of incredibly sexy bed-head hair, smooth yet tousled, that she'd pull back over one ear or toss back over her shoulder as she was bending and working at her tasks, slender and serious and so close yet so far away, and I barely remember how a woman's hair feels


I then returned to dreamwidth to tell him off, and I found quite a few exciting entries. Most of them he has since filtered from me (including the "i have somehow given myself a jocasta complex about a lesbian my daughter's age" bit quoted above), but he wrote some elaborate fanfiction on how unhappy I was in my marriage - specifically, that I was unhappy because I was married to an American millenial woman (he did, eventually, remember that I am also an American millenial woman - as you'll see), and that if we'd lived in a nice world where feminism didn't do this kind of thing, he could have taken me in hand.

(Mr Hyde appears never to have understood that I dated a man, that indeed I was dating a man when we met. I sent said man a copy of the rape screenshots, which I'll get to, and my ex bf absolutely flipped out. Thank me, Gordo, for not sending an American millenial man to your home address. Even if you lost twenty years, he would still have several inches and an easy fifty pounds of muscle on you.)

At the time, this was in 2019, and I laid some facts out for him, I told him

Even now, I'm just writing this for myself. It's pissing into the wind but after the tens of thousands of words you've written condemning me and condescending to me and evaluating my sex appeal and putting me in your fantasies I feel like I deserve to get to finally fucking say something. I know you won't understand any of it, that what you do take away will be twisted into something stupid.


I then logged out of DW, returning occasionally to delete entries and put them on my new blog, but not returning to his blog. Until today, I hadn't seen his responses, and I was not prepared for what the "twisted into something stupid" proved to be.

That’s not Kate: That’s hate. And it was a year ago - a long year about which I know nothing. I would wager my lunch money that she and her friend in Singapore have parted company; all such ‘relationships’ have the tensile strength of pie crust, and the author of the above isn’t the Kate whom [her friend in Singapore] knew, either.


You never understood the context of that "gentle, people-pleasing person," you've been chewing cud over for more than a decade, did you? Do you not remember the context? I was reflecting on how my anger, sense of justice, and regrettable disposition to "chivalry" could co-exist with a temperament disinclined to ever voice them.

Anyway, remember the last part of this story? The one where the horrible bitch gets hers in the end - Natalie's alcoholism, Ashe's weed-smoking, Melissa dying cold and alone while her two children ignore her?

Well, here's the thing about that.

Nothing bad happened to me!

But he wishes it did. Oh, he wishes so hard.

In light of recently discovered information, jeezus gawd that girl is a mess: She has corroded like a burst dry cell battery. It is a testament to her spirit, that she has not yet put a bullet through her head… So far as I know. [...] Charred frozen crash-site wreckage in a howling Arctic wind is all that remains of that today. No military career, no law school - she’s out now and doing some sort of victimocracy “social work,” at my last scanty information, her whole life warped and short-circuited into a narrower darker path of hate and perpetual grievance.


He has, over the years, fantasized about me killing myself.

I do not know if Kate is still alive or not. Most likely she is, but it’s by no means certain: The light of that EXIT sign was in her eyes.


Nothing bad happened to me, but the pattern couldn't complete if I were perfectly fine and just living on my own without him and happily with my fiancee, so Gordon made something bad up to punish me.

To paraphrase the Imperial Rescript of Surrender, the military situation has developed not necessarily to Kate’s advantage, while the general trends of her life have all turned against her interest [...] so now [she's] leaving, with none of her planned goals achieved.

And moreover, with her personal life heavily damaged. Not only did her sterile, hostile, ersatz “marriage of convenience” fall apart - as we’re not to know how many do, and that very suppression speaks for itself! - but worse.


Remember how I said he hates lesbians? That he's a homophobe? Yeah. My marriage was real - fortunately, so was my divorce. It's weird how he's acting like there's an attempt to suppress gay divorce statistics. Does he not know what google is? Very possibly not.

I base what follows on very few data, on a hunch - but it explains much, including observed changes in her behavior and that “active-duty retirement”:


You guys ready for this?

I suspect that Kate was raped.


It's funny how he spent so much time wailing about women making False Accusations...and then made one up himself.

I do not say “sexually assaulted,” for that is too vague, applying to the mere attempt also - and if Kate had fought off her attacker she’d have crowed like Peter Pan, waved the bloody shirt, raised hell.

She didn’t - because she didn’t.

Kate knows hand-to-hand combat and was a young athlete, but so was the larger stronger faster aggressive natural born warrior who, if I'm right, forcibly shattered the egalitarian make-believe of shapeless pajama uniforms and “gender-norming” to exercise a primal desire as old as warfare - to give the stagnant genetic cauldron a brisk stir! [She’d mentioned at one point that for all her workouts the guys who lifted her bodily off the ground for team photos made her seem like a child. Aren’t child soldiers “expressly against the law of arms”? (Henry V - Act 4, Scene 7)]


I am not and have never been a member of the people who have been raped party. The closest I have ever come, and likely ever will come, is reading this post. You really have thought about it, haven't you? All the little details, all the delightful political implications? Did you touch your pee pee while you thought it out, or does it just read that way?

I have an idea of when it happened, and saw what it did to the Kate I knew.


Was it after your 1,758th Dragon*Con post, or after you sent me pornography while I was at work?

“I will have to carry a gun solely to defend myself against random men,” Kate told me. Solely. Random. Any man. Every man. A gun.


Oh, my God. This is a common R2KBA talking point, how did you fuck it up so bad.

This was not the Kate I knew, who bore men no ill will per se and was often wryly amused by “Army men” and their attitudes. Something had gone very badly wrong - and like broken branches and gouged ground, the damage it did and the direction it came from are both visibly obvious.


Per se? I didn't, and I still don't...You, specifically, well. Not until I read this.

…“‘Sweet sixteen’s turned thirty-one,’ an’ it shows,” Lydia said. (Editor's Note: For him, it really is all about the age. Physical age and ill usage - i.e. rape - is what got me here!) “Th’ friend you remember is awreddy long gone, if you hadden’ noticed. An’ she idden’ ever comin’ back.”

“… Lucy,” I said, synapses almost audibly clicking. “Lucy Westenra.”

Lydia simply looked on, waiting.

“Dracula. Lucy was nineteen, and her best friend was Mina.”

“‘Estu lumo,’” Lydia intoned, nodding slowly. “And Lucy was destroyed.”

“She became the Bloofer Lady,” I said. “The change was not an improvement!”

“You know what straw dropped the marbles? She’d said she didn’t like growing her hair out, and I told her, “The only woman I’ve ever seen who didn’t look better with longer hair - and I include you! - was Audrey Hepburn.”

“‘Yeah, fuck off,’” Lydia finished. I grimaced.

“That was such a disconnect, I really did think she meant that for someone else!”

“… Maybe she did,” Lydia said quietly.

Not heeding, I plunged on. “And she tells me I’m crazy? A woman who responds to a sincere and encouraging compliment on her appearance with an obscenity, might not be the best adjudicator on what constitutes sanity, y’ know?”

“… Y’ know, honeybun, that’s been true for quite a while,” Lydia said in that same quiet tone. “Even when she was ‘Lucy,’ she still had more issues than National Geographic. Her name rhymes with ‘hate,’ and now she speaks of ‘soul cancer,’ and that’s how she described a friend who shot herself. This ‘Lucy’ didn’t need Dracula - she’s had the Bloofer Lady inside her all along! Y’ know?” She flicked an ash from the cigarette she wasn’t smoking, and it evaporated in midair. “Whatever that was happen’d to her in th’ Army, only made it worse.”

“… Wow,” I said again. Much of LYDIA.DOS was based on psychotherapy programs, and her own personality meshed well with that. The result was often insightful.

“All you can do is what she’s tellin’ you - go away. Life goes on - but relationships, here an’ now… don’t.” Lydia sat forward and looked straight at me.

“Remember Lucy. Remember the fun, funny, caring, charming friend you once knew. Stay away from the Bloofer Lady.”

“… Words to live by,” I said.


I can't believe you think I was raped...and write about it like this.

Without any irony, he notes

I miss my clever, caring, dear friend.


Oh, I'm here. Always have been, Edward. It's just people who don't trespass against my self have my friendship now. You were in, but you behaved so badly you forced yourself out, you see?

One might think that, if one were on the receiving end of the fifth or sixth "dear sir, cease and desist your insanity" note from a young female, one might be prompted to wonder if one's own behavior might have been to blame. But no - there are is only ONE reason that a woman might not want to sit at your table, and that is the reason that she was raped. Raped into showing her naturally hateful disposition.

I was more wrong about you than I ever knew - you are a monster.

Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter
2023-11-26 04:49 pm

Part One: Context

I need to work my way through this, through a decade and a half of garbage, so bear with me. It's heavy stuff, and I'm out of practice with this whole long-form blogging thing.

It used to be easy; I started blogging twenty and a half years ago, when I was 13, on a dead and wonderful site called LiveJournal. By the time I met the man this post is about, I was an old hand at blogging - but not, alas, an old hand at understanding humans.

I am about to make oldschool blogging look really bad, so I want to take a moment to try to convey to the Younger Generations just how excellent the old internet was. You could meet anyone and talk about anything, and achieve genuine intimacy in a way that isn't possible on tumblr, the site that ultimately replaced LJ, or anything with an algorithm. I recognize I sound old, but back in the day this thing really was better.

Which is not to say things were perfect; just because you could form genuine social connections doesn't mean that they were valuable or edifying. As Dr. Jeckyll, who became an old and dear friend, likes to say: it doesn't take all sorts to make a world, but that's what you find there.

We met when I was nineteen or twenty. He is my father's age.

You can see where this was going.

Being nineteen and a social freak, I didn't. As I told Mr. Hyde, one valuable function of the old style western patriarchy was to protect virgins from disreputable and feckless men. I had no such protection, and if I'd ever thought about it, which I did not (o youth!), I would have thought I was rendered immune to masculine nonsense by my homosexuality and afemininity (o hubris!).

Like me, Dr. Jekyll suffers from congenital melancholia. I've since come to terms with this vampire, but at the time I had no idea what was going on. I think he didn't know what was going on, either. We bonded over this life-sucking destructive force - or maybe it's not really a force, inertia isn't - because we were similarly crazy. We also both have ADHD and at the time I was also a libertarian (some mental illnesses can be cured).

There was always a lot to talk about, at least theoretically. In practice, Doctor J had a truly nasty streak lodged somewhere in him, and it was always there. I suppose you could call it a chip on his shoulder, but I think of it as shrapnel frozen near his heart. Or possibly in his brain. Less rose-colored glasses for his peepers and more acid-green filter for his tongue.

See, he hates women. 

Understand that he doesn't think of it this way. He has a utopian(?) view of the relationship between the sexes, and it's deranged but not something he regards as hateful. It goes something like this: women are moral, physical, intellectual, and emotional children, and it is a man's role to love and cherish them. In return, they honor and obey them. (I invoked the BCP there, but he isn't a Christian. He isn't interested in actual children, and one is left to wonder what the point is.)

We will use Natalie, a then-22 year old coworker he was romantically (and, ah, less romantically) interested in:

I was also advised that “she is my equal.” Tho' the statement was well meant, yet there is no factual basis for this optimistic claim, no sense whatever in which it is true, neither legally, physically, intellectually, educationally nor experientially. In the foremost she is more than equal, gifted by accident of birth with an irrevocable place among the new Victim Aristocracy (though only of the second rank, for she is white; being black counts for more than being female, as Hillary Clinton found out in 2008!) and in every other way the notion is farcical - and to claim that I am her equal would be a scathing put-down.


And what life would this child, whose face he has posted multiple times alongside her real name, lead in his utopia (which he refers to, sometimes, as 1969, when he would have been about five, or, sometimes, as 1965, when he would have been an infant)?

“Vanilla power exchange relationship with BDSM overtones”: [...] That is what I would like to enact with this girl, if I could. That's why I said that I wished that I could be her boyfriend - not 'that she were my girlfriend.' Because I was thinking, tho' I didn't realize it, in terms of what I would have offered her versus what I would want for it.

Just so, I managed to really hack off a good friend of mine when I said that the only way I could “take her in hand” as matters stand is if I could buy her at some slave market of history or fantasy. This would be a forcible enactment of the freedom from / freedom to exchange [yet] I would so cherish her! And I suspect she'd be happy!


Guy who's only read John Lange, looking at world: I'm getting a lot of Gor vibes off this

The reason reality doesn't mesh with Mr. Hyde's flawless understanding is that the KGB invented feminism and took over America in a calculated dysgenic kind of long term strategy thing.

This was, of course, the primary long-term goal of feminism, the KGB's most unusual “National Liberation Front”: Targeting higher-intelligence females at Western universities and persuading them to first, become impossibly ugly and obnoxious, and second, to abjure normal families and be “childfree” - in short, to delete themselves and their intelligence from the Western gene pool, leaving only the “Marching Morons” that Margaret Sanger and others rightly feared would inherit the ruins.


(Translator's gloss: he does, like Sanger sadly did, mean Negroes - or, as he calls them, the "visibly microcephalic." For a guy from Ohio, he's really at home with secesh thinking.)

These two themes - evil feminism and stupid women - are synthesized thus (taken from a representative entry entitled "Gendercrime"):

She is not in command, even when no one else is either.  I wish I was!

Okay, she isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer; she's a brunette, a “little brown-haired girl” in the literal meaning, but her functional intelligence is Scandihuvian blonde.  So?!  She's low-octane, low maintenance, humble, easily confused, chronically nervous, and totally adorkable.

I really wanted to drive her home - I could have picked her up this evening, where her car would have simply sat through the day in the parking lot, no big deal - but I couldn't leave work and it would have been both “inappropriate” as feminists have redefined that term, to refer to any expression of even implied heterosexuality, and on the same grounds it would have been a stupid, pointless risk.


The risk in question was that someone might file a second sexual harassment complaint against him at his box store. His account of the first sexual harassment complaint filed by a retail clerk he spent more than a decade viciously excoriating in the most ungentlemanly terms has always baffled me, even when I was on his side, so we'll leave it be.

She doesn't need brains. She needs a husband who understands his job. Unfortunately, lately the natural order of things has been sledgehammered by litigious psychotics with an agenda, and that Dumb Blonde, like all the “New Aristocracy,” has been given undeserved and ridiculously arbitrary power - a loaded weapon in the hands of a child.


He had this weird thing going with her twin sister for a while:

Twins, not clones: In terms of role-playing games, Mouse put points into Appearance that Dormouse diverted to Intelligence. The result was unmistakable as soon as they came of an age to be noticed: Dormouse is cute, pretty, discernibly more intelligent, while Mouse is smokin' - and dull. The difference is trivial; in practice, what's between their legs has always mattered far more than what's between their ears.


Incredible that neither of them fell into his arms, eh.

When she actually got into a relationship:

N B: I'm curious to know how long she's been lying through her teeth to me, and using my generosity while cynically telling me she doesn't like David and certainly doesn't want a “relationship” with him. I'll ask her in a day or so… Does anything MORE need to be added to why I detest “Millennial” American women?


and

“I don't deserve to be with anyone else because I'm a rude, heartless bitch - that's exactly what my ex-boyfriend said,” and y' know what, he was spot on.


and

I understand the concept of the Little White Lie.  She did not want to say, “Get lost you creep,” because after all we are co-workers and must get along.  Quite so. [...] My opinion of her intelligence has risen.  It's not a compliment.


I'm not cherry-picking; he went on like this for hundreds of thousands of words for literal years. I can currently see 56 entries tagged with the pseudonym he gave Natalie, but there are by his admission more than 368.

She was also not the first: before Natalie, there was Chrystle (34 entries I can see). Chrystle's a very interestin' story, but he's filtered the important bit - her eventual rejection of him, a version of the same OH MY GOD DUDE I eventually sent him - from my view and I can't get the exact order of events right. At some point into their friendship, she went radio silent and he sent her a package (I encouraged him in this: I don't have many regrets, but moral failure always stings). After she got it, she came back to LJ, saw the kind of things he was writing about her, and went off on him.

And, in between Chrystle and Natalie, there was me.

Like I said: you know how this goes. He encounters a woman in her late teens or early twenties. She's cute and innocent, but generally very stupid and crazy, in need of a saving and a spanking (these are the same thing). Their friendship goes on. After a certain point, always after he's expressed sexual interest, and always after she's matured to some extent, she becomes a baddie whom he simultaneously resents for not appreciating his good qualities and pities for being doomed to wallow in the horrible morass her manless, feminist-crafted world has created.

The element of comeuppance is a key part of the story, one I never pieced together until a few hours ago (and which I am writing these two entries in response to). The women who friendzone him are always worse off, somehow: Natalie drinks and is with a bad man ("Dustbin" Dustin, how clever).

While she goes home and drinks herself blotto damn near every day now, lonely and bored and ignored by her indifferent clod fiancé. I remember when that would have mattered to me - when I could have done something about it.


And

She has changed, matured. Objectively the changes are an improvement; she is stronger physically and emotionally. Yet she is still the “rude, selfish, heartless bitch” her then-ex-boyfriend (now fiancé!) named her, and now she has lost the sweet artless schoolgirl charm that so captivated me in 2015. Even that luscious hair is gone now, and the collar-length remnant is dyed “Soft Black” and shouldn't have been.

I suspect that she is depressed, chronically unhappy. Really. The poor thing. How terrible for her.


Ashe, a British shut-in whom he wanted to save but couldn't and who seems to have cut contact with him the same way Chrystle, Tiffany, both twins, Melissa, and I did:

Ashleigh is self-destructing with both hands. She's gone back to smoking weed, she's drinking 'badly,' and she left home (again) to stay with a 'friend' - her quotes. We no longer talk on the phone; she doesn't answer my texts. (Doesn't, not can't - she sent a casual five-word reply just yesterday.)

Nothing's going to happen there: There's no rabbit in that hat. I wish her well - but she is doomed, and so is a very foolish, indeed stupid idea I had…


Regarding Melissa, an ancient! shriveled! woman in her middle thirties!! who did not take him up on his proposal of marriage!! and now her two children will grow up committing fatherless behavior!!! and on the day of judgment!!! she will be called to account for her actions!!!!!

but for all her sanctimonious, conceited, vainglorious certainty on the matter, when the Roll is called Up Yonder Melissa might have some explaining to do herself. [...] She met and felt an inexplicable connection (odd, that) to a man who [...] would have employed her with or without quotes as his housekeeper, a quid pro quo rental arrangement similar to the “earn your keep” arrangement she (says she) has now, allowing her to homeschool her children; as her employer and landlord, would have enjoyed (and how!) a flagrantly, delightfully unprofessional relationship with his beautiful, clever semi-live-in housekeeper tenant [...] Eventually he might have asked her The Question. But practically it would already be settled [...] Instead she used her Golden Ticket as kindling paper, paying no heed to how weirdly long the Ticket lasted, this never-before-and-never-again chance to get out in style, with a place to live and a caring friend both laid on for her [...] Decisions have consequences. She will stay there. Her children will grow up there - mercifully, they will probably never know what she did to them.


I didn't really understand what I was seeing, when I was nineteen. I did not understand that one day he would force me to make him reckon with the fact that lesbian means lesbian and that his attentions were unwelcome, and that the horrible shrews (witches, bitches, and crazies he calls American women) would one day include me.

The signs were there, of course, and if I'd turned my intelligence (I'm smarter than him, by, like, a lot - I wouldn't ordinarily say such a thing, but he talks about other people like that and what's good for the goose &c) and skills from my powerhouse education (which I'm not sure he ever really acknowledged!) to analyzing the text I would have seen them.

He really hates lesbians, though this seems to be because he thinks political lesbians like Saint Andrea were actually homosexuals. Regarding Natalie (whose shirt slid up a tad while she was stocking at a Wal Mart):

She wore her hair loose, free-flying, tho' not “brushed out to shimmering &c.” - and it was beautiful; she wore no makeup, just her own face - and she was beautiful… Despite her attire, which was the plaid-shirt-and-blue-jeans boy-clothes dictated by lesbian feminists for young single white American girls since the 1970s.


and

She is as far from the FemiNazi propaganda image of the “independent, empowered (and Correctly heterophobic) wo-person” as you can get, for all that she is stuffed into imitation boy-clothes. She needs not a “partner,” the lesbian term toxic feminists have rammed down America’s throat, but a husband.


Hum. Sometimes I think hets who use "partner" are doing a little bit of stolen valor, but I guess it's pissing the right people off.

Okay, did you get all that? That's the background.

Web Analytics
2023-11-26 12:37 pm

Oh, Gordon

me: I don't know where to start with this one
But when I was younger, I think 18 or 19, I met this guy on LJ who's my dad's age less a year
I think you can see where this is going
Anyway, he spent a really long time writing fanfic about me (sometimes literally, as you are about to see) as well as every other woman he met
Eventually I got to the point where I checked out and stopped talking to him & he took this as me spiralling ("unraveling") and not putting him on an information diet
Then one day he annoyed me so much I snapped at him, logged into the site with the journal, and saw some TRULY INSANE THINGS
I told him off around three years ago but I had a dream about him last night and logged back in
WOW IT GOT EVEN CRAZIER
He wrote an elaborate head canon where I got mad at him because I was sexually assaulted in the army and turned into a man hater
Then he wrote actual fanfic about me

me: the SA [screencap]

me: the RPF [screencap]

me: He posted this like two years ago so I responded [screencap]

Person 1: fucking insanity

me: [gif of Sister Michael from Derry Girls saying 'fucking weirdo'], Person 2 agree emojis it.

Person 3: Your "sixty closest friends" and anyone else in this channel. But seriously, RPF is already sketchy enough when it's written about celebrities the author doesn't know. This is something else. [two emoji agree checkmarks]

Person 4: Holy shit. He thinks you were SA Ed and THIS is how he talks about it????
So dramatically and self aggrandizing

me: it's pornographic lol
the feminist bitch getting humbled is a staple of this kind of thing
he doesn't mean it Like That though 🙄

person 3: No, I suppose that would be crass. Unlike the rest of this perfectly healthy life choice...

me: this is like corkboard newspaper serial killer wall crazy [screencap]
i should write a blog post about this
and let him see it!!
or i should call him right now and play an airhorn into the speaker

person 4: crazy pills for the crazy man!

person 5: what the fuck
this guy is deranged

person 6: Le fuck

person 7: no

person 8: Jesus

me: guys it's getting worse
man my father's age posting about me like this [screencap]
@[my fiancee] he's super homophobic [screencap]

Fiancee: Your name rhymes with hate

Person 9: Where do you find these people?

Person 10: Bloofer Lady new screen name.

Person 9: I'm going to be using 'your name rhymes with hate' in the future.

me: he thinks i shot myself becuase i got raped in the ar mee [screencap]

Person 11: [psyduck emoji]

Person 12: OMFG
I am so utterly confused
So he just headcanoned that you shot yourself
And posted about it

me: like, repeatedly
he just kinda does things like that

Person 12: The light of the exit sign in your eyes was your desire to not see him

Person 13: Also this guy is a nutjob

Person 14: What the fuck is this man,

Person 4: This dude doesn't seem to view women as people but as a second secret thing

me: he explicitly calls women childre, mentally and physically and emotionally
if the ones he knows behave differently they're bitter shrews poisoned by feminism
for some reason this bitter shrewishness settles in after hum
age 25 or so

Person 4: The magical cutoff

Person 15: Obviously a supernatural change takes place when people get over his bullshit